浙江省食品安全风险社会共治示范引领综合评价研究
作者:
作者单位:

浙江药科职业大学,浙江 宁波 315500

作者简介:

汪雨龙 男 副教授 研究方向为食品安全监管 E-mail:yulongwang1987@126.com

通讯作者:

陈志良 男 教授 研究方向为食品安全监管 E-mail:9578801@qq.com

中图分类号:

R155

基金项目:

浙江省社科规划课题成果(23NDJC387YB);2021年浙江省市场监督管理局科技计划项目(ZC2021A044);2022年浙江省教育厅一般科研项目(Y202250031)


Comprehensive evaluation of the demonstration and guiding effects of food safety risk by social co-governance in Zhejiang Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Zhejiang Pharmaceutical University, Zhejiang Ningbo 315500, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 运用模糊层次分析法对浙江省食品安全风险社会共治水平开展量化评判实证研究,为食品安全示范城市创建社会共治示范引领项目提供借鉴和参考。方法 基于国家和地方食品安全示范城市创建标准,结合文献调研、德尔菲法和层次分析法确立食品安全社会共治综合评价体系及指标权重,再运用模糊综合评价法,对浙江省创建材料进行考核评分,完成食品安全社会共治的量化评判。结果 建立的食品安全风险社会共治评价指标体系包含4个一级指标、12个二级指标和34个三级指标。按照权重排序,地方政府和企业仍然是城市食品安全两大主体,其他社会团体和公众作为第三方力量协同治理;地方政府应强化党政同责和资源保障,企业应依法持证并落实食品安全自查,新闻媒体应做好舆情监测与报道,行业协会应助力地方产业高质量发展,公众应多渠道参与监督。参与创建的三个城市食品安全社会共治总体水平均处于“好”等级,但内部指标有所差异,主要薄弱环节是社会协同,处于“较好”等级。结论 该指标体系契合当前城市食品安全社会共治评价的需要,在食品安全示范城市创建及示范引领中具备实际应用价值。

    Abstract:

    Objective This study aimed to provide references for the demonstration and guiding effects of food safety demonstration city creation, quantitative assessment, and empirical research on the social co-governance level of food safety risks in Zhejiang Province by analyzing the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.Methods A comprehensive evaluation index system and its weight coefficient was established through literature research, the Delphi method, and an analytic hierarchy process combined with the national and local food safety demonstration city standards. Subsequently, experts were invited to assess and score application materials based on the fuzzy synthesis method; then, the results of social co-governance could be quantized.Results The food safety social co-governance evaluation index system developed contained four primary indices, 12 secondary indices, and 34 tertiary indices. According to the weight sort, local governments and enterprises were still the two principal parts of regional food security. Public and other social groups were explored in the collaborative governance as the third party forces. In addition, local governments, enterprises, new media, guilds, and the public should strengthen the party and the government should have a co-responsibility and guarantee resources, obtain certificates, and perform self-inspections following the law, and monitor and report public opinion information, assist high-quality local industry development, and participate in supervision through multiple channels. Although the overall level of food safety social co-governance was at the “very good” level, the internal indicators still differed within the three co-created cities. The main weak link was social coordination, which was at a “good” level.Conclusion The index system can fit the need for the evaluation of food safety social co-governance. Hence, it has practical application value in the establishment and guiding effects of food safety demonstration cities.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

汪雨龙,陈志良.浙江省食品安全风险社会共治示范引领综合评价研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2023,35(11):1623-1630.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-20
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭