我国预包装食品致敏原声称情况调查
作者:
作者单位:

(1.国家食品安全风险评估中心,北京 100022;2.中国农业大学食品科学与营养工程学院 北京食品营养与人类健康高精尖创新中心,北京 100083)

作者简介:

李雪娇 女 硕士生 研究方向为食物过敏 E-mail:lixuejiao1994@126.com 樊永祥 男 研究员 研究方向为食品安全国家标准管理 E-mail:fanyongxiang@cfsa.net.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Investigation on the allergen claims of pre-packaged food in China
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment,Beijing 100022,China;2.Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health,College of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083,China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 了解我国预包装食品标签中致敏原声称的使用情况,为修订《预包装食品标签通则》提供建议。方法 在全国各地大中型超市进行采样或拍照,收集预包装食品致敏原标签声称信息并录入Excel,对各类食品的致敏原声称使用情况进行统计。结果 共采集8 694份样品,致敏原标签的总体标识率为21.58%(1 876/8 694),其中焙烤食品含有致敏原声称的标识率最高(65.73%, 468/712)。各致敏原成分中,关于乳及乳制品致敏原的声称率最高(17.09%,1 486/8 694),使用“可能含有”“本生产线也生产”“本加工设备也生产”“本生产工厂也加工”等常用于表明存在交叉接触的预防性致敏原声称的频率较高,主要集中在焙烤食品、膨化食品、谷物及其制品等3类食品中。结论 我国预包装食品中使用食品致敏原声称的食品种类较多,致敏原声称的使用缺乏规范,个别食品类别使用预防性致敏原声称的频率较高。致敏原声称在食品产品中广泛使用,应将其作为我国致敏原标识管理的重点。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the current status of allergen claims in the label of prepackaged foods in China, and to provide suggestions for the revision of the General Rules for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods. Methods Sampling or photographing was performed in large and medium-sized supermarkets across the country, allergen claims information on pre-packaged food were collected, various food allergen claims were analyzed. Results A total of 8 694 samples were included. The overall identification rate of allergen claims was 21.58%(1 876/8 694). The percentage of foods containing allergens claims in bakery foods was the highest(65.73%, 468/712). Among the allergens, the highest rate of claims was milk and dairy (17.09%,1 486/8 694). The most frequent claims were “may contain”, “this streamline also produces”, “this processing equipment also produces”, and “this plant also processes” which indicated the presence of cross-contaminations, and those claims were mainly in bakery foods, puffed foods, grains and their products. Conclusion There were many types of food allergens in pre-packaged foods in China. The use of allergen claim was not standardized, and their were too many cross-contamination claims. In general, allergen claims were widely used in food products and should become the focus of allergens management in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李雪娇,于航宇,邢航,车会莲,樊永祥.我国预包装食品致敏原声称情况调查[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2020,32(1):62-65.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-14
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-02-25
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭