积聚暴露评估方法的建立及其在我国0~6月龄婴儿双酚A风险评估中的应用
作者:
作者单位:

(1.首都医科大学公共卫生学院,北京 100069;2.北京市疾病预防控制中心 北京市食物中毒 诊断溯源技术重点实验室,北京 100013;3.国家食品安全风险评估中心,北京 100022)

作者简介:

肖文 女 硕士生 研究方向为公共卫生 E-mail:wenxiao925@126.com通信作者:┣┣(中)通信作者┫┫隋海霞 女 研究员 研究方向为食品安全风险评估 E-mail:suihaixia@cfsa.net.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国食品科学技术学会食品科技基金—雅培食品营养与安全专项科研基金(2017-17)


Establishment of aggregated exposure approach and its application in the assessment of potential health risk of bisphenol A among Chinese infants aged 0-6 months
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China;2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnostic and Traceability Technologies for Food Poisoning,Beijing Center for Diseases Prevention and Control,Beijing 100013, China;3.China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing 100022, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 以双酚A(BPA)为模式化学物,建立积聚暴露评估方法,并计算我国0~6月龄婴儿中BPA的积聚暴露水平及其潜在风险。方法 建立涵盖经口、经皮和吸入的积聚暴露评估方法。BPA各暴露来源的含量数据采用文献检索方法获得,膳食及非膳食的消费量数据参考世界卫生组织(WHO)对0~12月龄婴幼儿水的推荐消费量以及《中国人群暴露参数手册(儿童卷:0~5岁)》经口、吸入、经皮的暴露参数。采用积聚暴露评估法对我国0~6月龄婴儿3种喂养模式[母乳喂养、配方粉喂养+使用聚碳酸酯(PC)奶瓶、配方粉喂养+使用不含BPA奶瓶]的BPA积聚暴露水平及其潜在的健康风险进行评估。分别使用前进法和后退法计算0~6月龄婴儿BPA的内暴露,并对两种计算方法的结果进行比较。结果 0~6月龄婴儿的3种喂养模式中BPA的高端积聚暴露量范围为129.82~4 093.40 ng/kg BW,配方粉+使用PC奶瓶喂养模式的BPA高端积聚暴露量超过BPA的暂定可耐受摄入量(t-TDI),其他喂养模式均低于t-TDI。对不同暴露来源的总BPA(游离型和结合型BPA的合计)暴露量分析发现,膳食来源摄入的BPA贡献率最高,其次为纺织品。而对于具有毒理学意义的游离型BPA总暴露量分析发现,贡献率最高的依然是膳食暴露,但贡献率第二的为室内空气。使用前进法与后退法获得的内暴露量相近。结论 BPA的外暴露未遗漏主要暴露来源,除配方粉+PC奶瓶喂养模式的高端暴露量超过t-TDI外,0~6月龄婴儿其他喂养模式的平均和高端暴露量均低于t-TDI,健康风险较低,而使用PC奶瓶会增加风险。

    Abstract:

    Objective To establish the aggregated exposure approach and to apply it in the assessment of potential health risk of bisphenol A (BPA) among Chinese infants aged 0-6 months as a model chemical. Methods Aggregated exposure approach was established by incorporating the oral, dermal and inhalation pathway. BPA concentration data of different exposure routes were obtained from literature, the consumption data of dietary and non-dietary routes were referred to the recommended intake of water by World Health Organization(WHO)(0-12 months), and the exposure factor handbook of Chinese population (0-5 years). The aggregated exposure level and potential health risks of the three feeding patterns were assessed, that is, breastfeeding, infant formula feeding with polycarbonate(PC) bottle, as well as infant formula feeding with BPA-free bottle. Internal BPA exposure was calculated by backward method and forward method. The internal result of two approaches were then compared. Results Daily BPA exposure ranged from 129.82 to 4 093.40 ng/kg BW for three feeding patterns. Except the high exposure for infant formula with PC baby bottle feeding pattern, other feeding patterns were all lower than the temporary-daily tolerable intake (t-TDI). For the total BPA (sum of conjugated and unconjugated BPA) intake, dietary exposure contributed the most, followed by textile. While for unconjugated BPA which was of toxicological concern, dietary exposure still contributed the most, followed by indoor air. The internal exposure calculated from the forward method and the backward method was similar. Conclusion Except the high BPA aggregated exposure for feeding pattern of infant formula with PC bottle, the mean and high exposure for other feeding patters were all below t-TDI, suggesting infants in China had low health risks exposed to BPA, while the use of PC baby bottles could increase the risk.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

肖文,刘兆平,隋海霞,宁钧宇.积聚暴露评估方法的建立及其在我国0~6月龄婴儿双酚A风险评估中的应用[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2018,30(4):429-435.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-08-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭