地方政府食品安全监管考评指标赋分方法初探
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.国家食品安全风险评估中心,北京 100022; 2.国家食品药品监督管理总局,北京 100053)

作者简介:

李业鹏 女 研究员 研究方向为实验室质量和安全管理E-mail:liyepeng66@sina.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Scoring method for government food safety supervision evaluation
Author:
Affiliation:

(China National Centre for Food Safety Risk Assessment,Beijing 100022,China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究探讨地方政府食品安全监管考评指标科学客观的赋分方法。方法 应用层次分析法,设计考核评价指标间重要性比较表格,由各级地方政府不同部门的食品安全监管人员和技术专家独立判断指标间重要程度,汇总分析并计算考核评价指标的权重比例和各考核指标的赋分。结果 ①完善体制机制、打击违法犯罪、督促企业落实主体责任、食品安全重点工作开展情况、食品安全事故处理、食品安全信息公布、食品安全宣传教育和有奖举办制度8个一级指标权重分别为21.3%、16.4%、14.7%、13.5%、13.2%、7.3%、7.1%、6.5%;②对每个二级指标也计算了权重比例,一级和二级指标共同确定了二级指标赋分;③层次分析法赋分与原方案赋分相比,总体基本一致,个别不同;④从食品安全监管的角度分析,体制机制、打击违法犯罪、落实企业主体责任是当前地方政府食品安全监管工作的重中之重。结论 使用层次分析法为群决策项目赋分更加科学客观,具可操作性。

    Abstract:

    To develop a scientific and index for the local government food safety supervision evaluation.MethodsUsing analytic hierarchy process(AHP), evaluation index comparison table was designed, the supervision personnel from different governmentdepartments at all levels was invited to fill in the tableindependently according to his judgment. The weight and score of evaluation index was analyzed and calculated by summary analysis. Results① The weight of 8 level-one index including improvingthe institutional mechanisms, cracking down on crimes, urging the enterprises to implement their responsibility,status of food safetypriorities, food safety accident treatment, food safety information disclosure, publicity and educationand award report was 21.3%, 16.4%, 14.7%, 13.5%, 13.2%, 7.3%, 7.1% and 6.5%; ② The weight and score of level-two index was also calculated; ③ The AHP score and the original score were coherent with several exception; ④The institutional mechanism, cracking down crimes, urging the enterprises to implement their responsibility would be the priorities of local government.ConclusionGroup decision-making scoring using analytic hierarchy process was more scientific, objective and operable.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李业鹏,于军,樊红平,李宁.地方政府食品安全监管考评指标赋分方法初探[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2014,26(4):380-385.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-08-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
严正声明
关闭