实验室技术能力综合评价方法初步探讨
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

周爽 女 助理研究员 研究方向为分析化学 E-mail:szhoupku@gmail.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

“十二五”科技支撑计划(2011BAK10B07)


Preliminary discussion on comprehensive statistical treatments of proficiency test results
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    探讨实验室技术能力综合量化分析评价方法。方法 利用国家食品安全风险评估中心组织的3次食品中重金属分析考核结果,比较了Z比分数方法、点分数法和组合分数法对考核的综合量化分析结果。结果 Z比分数法得到的5个考核目标物的满意率分别为78.1%、93.8%、81.2%、90.6%和93.8%;点分数法评价3次考核的满意率分别为75%、71.9%、90.6%;组合分数法评价3次考核各实验室综合表现满意率为81.2%。结论 3种不同评价方法各有侧重,适合于不同目的的结果分析。Z比分数法适用于单一因素分析能力评价;点分数法适用于一次多个因素分析能力综合性评价;组合分数法适用于实验室历次考核结果综合能力分析。

    Abstract:

    To discuss the comprehensive assessment methods for evaluation of proficiency test results. Methods Statistical methods of Z-score, point-score-system and combination scores were used to evaluate the laboratory test results from three times and provide a general assessment. Results The pass rates that analyzed by Z-score method for the five targets were 78.1%, 93.8%, 81.2%, 90.6% and 93.8%, respectively. Using point-score-system, the pass rates of the three tests were 75%, 71.9% and 90.6%. And with combination scores, 81.2% of the laboratories showed satisfying performances. Conclusion The three evaluation methods showed advantages in different aspects and fit for the comprehensive evaluation of proficiency tests.Z-score fit for single tested substance; point-score-system was suitable for each test with multi-target substances; combination scores were competent for comprehensive assessment of each laboratory during several tests.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周爽,岳兵,赵馨,马兰,赵云峰.实验室技术能力综合评价方法初步探讨[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2013,25(3):233-237.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-06-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭