谈美国德莱尼条款对我国食品安全政策的启示
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

郭智成 男 主任医师 研究方向为食品卫生标准、食物中毒、食品添加剂和食品容器包装材料 E-mail:zhihe-80222@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Implications from the Delaney Clause on Food Safety Policy in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    德莱尼条款宣称:“任何一个添加剂如果人或动物进食后发现致癌,或者经食品添加剂安全评价实验后发现致癌就不能被确认其作为人食用的食品是安全的”。 该条款作为《美国联邦食品药品化妆品法》的修正案,主张采取“零危险”的食品安全政策,在农药和食品添加剂的管理方面带来了混乱的后果,引起世界范围内长达半个世纪的激烈争论。它对我国食品安全工作也很有启示:1.“可忽略危险”政策应作为我国食品安全政策的基石;2.对新食品和食品用新产品进行风险与效益分析要作为制定我国食品安全标准的重要原则;3.“零危险”食品不存在的事实是必须完善我国食品召回制度的重要依据;4.遵循科学原则和防制情绪化宣泄应作为我国重要的食品安全政策。

    Abstract:

    The Delaney Clause in the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of the United States indicates that “no additive shall be deemed safe if it is found to induce cancer when ingested by man or animal, or if it is found, after tests which are appropriate for the evaluation of the safety of food additive, to induce cancer in man or animal”. The clause is an example of “zero risk” criteria in food safety policy, which is responsible for confusing regulation of pesticide residues and food additives and leading to sharp conflict all over the world for 50 years. It greatly inspires us that: the “negligible risk” policy should be adopted for our food safety policy; food standard should be set at levels that balancing the needs of protecting consumer’s health against the needs for an adequate, wholesome and economical food supply according to risk and benefit assessment; “zero risk” food can hardly be existed; the food recall system should be strengthened and food safety policy should be based on science, not emotion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郭智成.谈美国德莱尼条款对我国食品安全政策的启示[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2010,22(5):403-406.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭