Objective In order to collect and analyze the suggestions and opinions in re-evaluation for the food additive standard system of China, and provide references for the revisions of the standards. Methods Feedbacks were collected through the “National Food Safety Standard Track and Re-evaluation Platform” from all aspects of GB 2760—2014, including product standards, labeling standards and production specifications. The rationality and feasibility of the opinions and suggestions were analyzed, and suggestions are proposed for standard revisions. Results This study collected about 207 opinions and suggestions through the platform from 2019 to 2020, mainly focusing on the application of GB 2760 and the content of product quality specifications, and analyzed the rationality and feasibility of the opinions. Conclusion The tracking and re-evaluation of standard is an important means to understand the implementation effect of standard. The reasonable opinions from the tracking and re-evaluation of standard provide a reference for the revision of the standard, and at the same time, the high-quality completion of the tracking and re-evaluation could improve the pertinence and practicality of publicity and implementation of national food safety standard.