To provide basis for strengthening the management of food labels and identified of food adulteration in Suzhou area,compared the meat source components with the label content.Methodsmeat species of animal source food in Suzhou region was detected using Taqman real-time PCR assays, and compared with the label, identification of food adulteration. ResultsThe test samples of 90cases involved 32production units, the overall is not coincidence rate was 25.6% (23/90). The detection of beef and its products in 44cases, 12cases were inconsistent with the label, there are 8cases of samples with pork partly replace beef; 1case with duck part instead of beef sales; In addition has 3cases do not contain beef ingredients, there are pigs, chicken, duck meat outside source sex composition of meat. Detected mutton and its products in 16cases, 2cases of samples are replaced mutton sold with duck, 3cases of mutton samples mixed with part of the composition of pig; Among them 1case sample there is a single sample doped two exogenous meat phenomenon, in addition to the mixed with pig source sex also detected duck source sex composition. Detection of pork and its products (19cases), including 2cases of samples containing the tag did not indicate the composition of chicken. Of the 11cases of mixed meat sample inspection, were 4cases of which components do not tally with the tag, mainly cheap chicken instead of/partly replacing relatively high price of beef and pork.ConclusionMeat products adulteration was the common situation, with cheap meat instead of some or all high prices meat. Carrying out meat adulteration detection has positive significance to regulate meat market. In addition, 3cases of unknown provenance composition of beef samples suggested that expanding the detection range is neccessey, nip in the bud.